Dear
Friends and Colleagues:
We've all probably fallen victim to
it at some point. Another year, another
data point, another presentation or poster to justify the travel expenses to
yet another meeting. I know I’ve
suffered from "meeting fatigue" and been guilty of just going through
the motions once or twice in the past (although I refuse to admit where or
when). With grants to write, courses to
prepare and teach, journal papers to publish and administrators to fight, who
has time for one more meeting? At least
most large professional scientific societies can attract attendees by virtue of
an exotic and desirable location. But Cleveland, well, in Cleveland
you need something more. The meeting
itself needs to be the draw, so you have to do something to make it special.
This is exactly what the organizing
committed attempted to do with IFESS 2001.
As the hosts of the first meeting of the organization in the new
millennium, we set out to make the scientific program and the entire experience
special, memorable, and of lasting value.
These proceedings are one record by which you can gage our success. If we’ve been successful then this volume
should become indispensable, dog-eared, and well-creased from use. It should be the first place you look for a
citation or reference to innovative work, and tempt you to violate the
copyright by duplicating it liberally, and maybe even build excerpts from it
into your teaching curricula. At the
very least, we sincerely hope that it is worth the excess baggage charges the
airlines will tack on to your fare for the added weight it represents in your
luggage.
But we're not taking any
chances. This compendium isn't the only
written record of our meeting. It
captures only original, at-large submissions reviewed and approved for
inclusion by the Scientific Program committee.
The six invited "Millennium Papers", those forward looking
position statements identifying the major challenges facing the field which
were to be presented orally during the conference, do not appear. They've been compiled and published in a
special issue of Neuromodulation, now
the official journal of IFESS. Similarly
the three "Special Sessions" (on the interaction of FES with neural
plasticity and repair, emerging clinical application of FES,
and consumer perspectives on neuroprostheses) have been captured and distilled
into articles to appear in a special issue of The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. Special
enough? The editorial boards of two
leading journals in the field think so.
We hope you do, too.
The people who really struggled to make IFESS 2001
special aren't all listed with the organizing committee on the previous page,
or on the conference program or even the table of contents of these
proceedings. Laura Polacek, Cathy
Walker, Merien Washington, Donna Tamulewicz, Sue Kalas, Kath Bogie, Ken
Gustafson, Ron Hart, Jon Gray, and many, many others all deserve your thanks
and gratitude. But no one deserves it
more than Jeanne Teeter who saw this through from its inception and kept us
sane, solvent and on schedule in a most professional manner.
Memorable?
You bet. Special? No
question. Indispensable?
Absolutely. Just another meeting? I think not.
Ronald J. Triolo
Cleveland Ohio
IFESS 2001
Proceedings
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Deep brain
stimulation: Challenges to integrating stimulation technology with human
neurobiology, neuroplasticity and neural repair
Andres Lozano, MD PhD, FRCSC [HTML] [PDF]
Oral Session I:
01.1 Walk! -
Experiments with a Cooperative Neuroprosthetic System for the Restoration of
Gait
T. Fuhr, J. Quintern, R. Riener, G. Schmidt [HTML] [PDF]
O1.2
A
Multicenter Study of an Implanted Neuroprosthesis for Restoring Hand Grasp in
Tetraplegia
P.H.
Peckham, M.W. Keith, K.L. Kilgore, J.H. Grill, K.S. Wuolle, G.B.Thrope, P.
Gorman, J. Hobby, M.J. Mulcahey, S. Carroll, V.R. Hentz, A. Wiegner [HTML] [PDF]
O1.3 Clinical Trials of BION Injectable Neuromuscular
Stimulators
A. Dupont,
S.D. Bagg, J.L. Creasy, C.
Romano, D. Romano, G.E. Loeb, F.J.R. Richmond [HTML] [PDF]
O1.4 New Results
in Feedback Control of Unsupported Standing in Paraplegia
H. Gollee, K. J. Hunt, D.
Wood, C. McFadden [HTML] [PDF]
O1.5 Is
Paraplegic Standing by Root Stimulation a Practical Option? - Conclusions from
the Larsi Project
D.E..Wood , N. Donaldson, C. McFadden, T.A.Perkins, D.N. Rushton,
A.M.Tromans [HTML] [PDF]
Oral
Session II:
O2.1 Bladder Contractions Evoked by
Electrical Stimulation of Pudendal Afferents in the Cat
K.J. Gustafson,
W.M. Grill [HTML] [PDF]
O2.2 Detrusor and
Blood Pressure Responses on Dorsal Penile Nerve Stimulation During
Hyper-reflexic Contracture of Bladder in Patients with Cervical Cord Injury
Y.
Lee, J. Song, G. Creasey, J. Kim, H. Lim, K.
Song [HTML] [PDF]
O2.3 Long-term
Electroneurographic Recordings from Nerve Cuff Electrodes on Sacral Nerve Root
in Pigs
G.A.M.
Kurstjens, A.L. Dalmose, M. Haugland, N.J.M. Rijkhoff, T. Sinkjær [HTML] [PDF]
O2.4 Functional
Electrical Stimulation of Abdominal Muscles (FESAM) In Spinal Cord Injury
During Phrenic Nerve Stimulation
F. Kandare, U. Stanic, J. Jeraj, G. Exner, J.
Šorli, R. Jaeger, A. Pedotti, A. Aliverti, R. Dellaca [HTML] [PDF]
O2.5 Recurrent
Laryngeal Nerve Stimulation to Reduce Aspiration: Demonstration of Clinical
Feasibility
D. J. Tyler, M. Broniatowski, S.
Grundfest-Broniatowski, S. Brodsky [HTML] [PDF]
Poster Session I:
Principles & Applications of Neuroprostheses
P1.1 Analysis of Trunk Motion During
Electrically Stimulated Cough in Spinal Cord Injury
R.J. Jaeger, W.E. Langbein, C.
Maloney, L. Fehr, F. Laghi, B. Nemchausky, F. Kandare, U. Stanic [HTML] [PDF]
P1.2 The Effect
of Electrically-Induced Trunk Extension on Seated Posture and Balance
S.N. Kukke, R.J. Triolo, J.P. Uhlir, J.A. Davis, Jr. [HTML] [PDF]
P1.3 Changes in
Hand Function after Implantation of an Upper Extremity Neuroprosthesis as
Measured by the Grasp and Release Test
A.M. Bryden, K.S. Wuolle,
K.L. Kilgore, P.H. Peckham, M.W. Keith
[HTML] [PDF]
P1.4 A Second
Generation Neuroprosthesis for Upper Extremity Spinal Cord
N.
Bhadra, P.H.Peckham, K.L. Kilgore, M.W. Keith [HTML] [PDF]
P1.5 Restoration of Elbow Extension Via FES in Individuals With Tetraplegia
W.D.
Memberg, P.E. Crago [HTML] [PDF]
P1.6 Effects on
Percutaneous Intramuscular Therapeutic Electrical Stimulus in Activities of
Daily Living in Patients with Incomplete Paraplegia
H. Ito, Y. Shimada, T. Matsunaga, Y. Tsutsumi, S. Ando,
T. Minato, M. Sato, S. Chida, K. Hatakeyama, K. Iizuka [HTML] [PDF]
P1.7 Functional
Electrical Stimulation for Paraplegia Long -Term Clinical Follow-up
S. Nandurkar, E.B
Marsolais, R. Kobetic [HTML] [PDF]
P1.8 Percutaneous Implantable Functional
Electrical Stimulation for Upright Mobility in Children With Spinal Cord
Injury: Description of Surgical Technique
R.R. Betz, T. Johnston, B.T. Smith, M.J. Mulcahey,
J.J. McCarthy [HTML] [PDF]
P1.9 One Year Implanted Patients Follow Up:
SUAW Project First Results
D. Guiraud, A. Pacetti, E. Meola, J.L.
Divoux, P. Rabischong [HTML] [PDF]
P1.10 Development of Gait Assist Device for Foot Drop
Patients
A. Kamono, Y. Kotaka, Y. Tomita [HTML] [PDF]
P1.11 Age-Dependent
Clinical Results of EMG-Triggered Electrostimulation in the Treatment of Stroke
Patients
T. Mokrusch [HTML] [PDF]
P1.12 Roles of
Upper Extremities with Complete Paraplegia in Standing FES
T. Fujii, K. Aidu, S.
Yamamoto, M. Ichie, Y. Handa, N. Hoshimiya, I.
Handa [HTML] [PDF]
P1.13 The Effect
of Stimulated Trunk Extension on the Upright Body Weight Distributioin While
Standing with Functional Neuromuscular Stimulation
J.P. Uhlir, R.J. Triolo,
J.A. Davis, Jr. [HTML] [PDF]
P1.14 Paraplegic Standing Supported by FES-Controlled Ankle
Stiffness
R.-P. Jaime, Z.
Matjačić, K. J. Hunt [HTML] [PDF]
P1.15 Standing
Stability of the Medial Linkage KAFOs Using Functional Electrical Stimulation
in Complete Paraplegia
T. Minato, Y. Shimada, K.
Sato, T. Matsunaga, Y. Tsutsumi, A. Misawa, S. Ando, H. Ito, M. Sato, K.
Hatakeyama, S. Chida, K. Iizuka [HTML] [PDF]
P1.16 Hybrid Orthosis with Controllable Hip and Knee Joints
and Multichannel FES for Walking in Paraplegia
R. Kobetic, E.B. Marsolais,
R. M. Kolacinski, R. Gaudio, S. Nandurkar, R. Triolo [HTML] [PDF]
P1.17 The Praxis
FES-24B System For Functional Restoration in Paraplegia
R. Davis, A. Barriskill, Z. Milijasevic, T. Houdayer,
B. Andrews [HTML] [PDF]
P1.18 An
Implantable Functional Electrical Stimulation System for Upright Mobility in
Children and Adolescents with Spinal Cord Injury
T.E. Johnston, R.R. Betz, B.T. Smith, M.J. Mulcahey [HTML] [PDF]
P1.19 Implantable FES System for Upper or Lower Limb Function in the
Growing Child With a Spinal Cord Injury
B.T.
Smith, R.R. Betz, M.J. Mulcahey [HTML] [PDF]
P1.20 Preliminary
Findings of a Study of the Effect of Functional Electrical Stimulation on the
Gait of Children with Cerebral Palsy
C.H.H.
Stevens, S. Durham, L. Eve , D.J. Ewins [HTML] [PDF]
P1.21 Cutaneous Sensory Perception Training Using Electrical
Stimulation. Three case studies
P.
Taylor, J. Burridge [HTML] [PDF]
P1.22 Seven Year
Follow-up of Sacral Anterior Root Stimulation for Bladder Control in Patients with
a Spinal Cord Injury: Complications and Quality of Life
J.M.
Vastenholt, M.J. Ijzerman, H.P.J. Buschman, G.J. Snoek, H.E. van der Aa [HTML] [PDF]
P1.23 Case Report: The Effect of Urinary Tract Infection on
Continence in Patients with the Vocare System
L.
Merenda, R.R. Betz [HTML] [PDF]
P1.24 Control of Incontinence in Supra-sacral Spinal Cord
Injury Patient using Cyclic Short-Duration Dorsal Penile Nerve Stimulation: A
Case Report
Y. Lee, G. Creasey, J. Song,
J. Kim, K. Song [HTML] [PDF]
P1.25 Repetition Of
Conditional Stimulations As Treatment For Detrusor Hyperreflexia May Potentiate
The Effect
P1.26 A Modeling
Study of Optic Nerve Stimulation by Surface Eyelid Electrode
M. Oozeer, A.
Andrien, J. Delbeke, V. Legat, C.
Veraart [HTML] [PDF]
Oral Session III:
Clinical/Therapeutic
Applications & Neuromodulation
O3.1 Relationship
between Hemiparetic Upper Limb Motor Function and Median Nerve Somatosensory Evoked
Potential among Chronic Stroke Survivors
B.K. Park, J. Chae, Y. Lee [HTML] [PDF]
O3.2 Functional Electrical
Therapy (FET) for Improving the Reaching and Grasping in Hemiplegics
D.B. Popovic, T. Sinkjær, M.B. Popovic, A .Stefanovic,
A. Pjanovic, L. Schwirtlich [HTML] [PDF]
O3.3 Long Term
Effects of FES-Assisted Walking on Dynamic Stiffness of Spastic Ankle
M.M.Mirbagheri, M.Ladouceur, H.Barbeau, R.E.Kearney [HTML] [PDF]
O3.4 Modified
Concept 2TM Rowing Machine With Manual FES
Controller for Total Body Exercise in Paraplegia
R. Davoodi, B. Andrews, G. Wheeler [HTML] [PDF]
O3.5 From Circuit
Design to Service Delivery-Establishing a Clinical FES
Service
I.D.
Swain, J.H. Burridge, S.E. Crook, S.M. Finn, C.A Johnson, G.E. Mann, P.N. Taylor,
P.A. Wright [HTML] [PDF]
Oral Session IV:
Command/Control
Interfaces & Information Exchange with the Nervous
System
04.1
Movement Synergies Elicited by Intraspinal
Microstimulation Compared to Stimulation of Muscles, Nerves And Roots in the
Cat
Y. Aoyagi, V.K. Mushahwar, R.B. Stein, A.
Prochazka [HTML] [PDF]
O4.2 Linear
Summation of Torque Produced Using Stimulation Applied From a Nerve Cuff
Electrode
M.D. Tarler, J.T. Mortimer [HTML] [PDF]
O4.3 Selective
Recordings of Motor Signals from the Corticospinal Tract
M. Sahin [HTML]
[PDF]
O4.4 On The
Correlation Between Upper Body EMG and Knee Moment During Assisted Sit to Stand
Movement
M. Ferrarin, E. Bertelli, W. Frasson, R. Thorsen,
E. Pavan, C. Frigo
[HTML] [PDF]
O4.5 Using Virtual
Reality to Test the Feasibility of Controlling an Upper Limb FES
System Directly From Multiunit Activity in the Motor Cortex
D.M. Taylor, A. B.
Schwartz [HTML] [PDF]
Poster Session II:
Human
Performance & User Interfaces
P2.1 The Use of
Artificial Sensors in FES Gait Re-education
System
I.
Cikajlo, T. Bajd
[HTML] [PDF]
P2.2 Gait Event
Detection Using Intramuscular Electromyography to Trigger Functional Electrical
Stimulation in the Child with Cerebral Palsy
D. Coiro, B. Smith, R. Betz [HTML] [PDF]
P2.3 Functional
Electrical Stimulation vs. Voluntary Muscle Contraction: A Comparison Between
Able-Bodied and People with Spinal Cord Injury
D. Faghri, J.P. Yount, W.J. Pesce,
S. Seetharama
[HTML] [PDF]
P2.4 Case Study
in Generalization Performance of Real Time Foot-drop Correction using Natural
Sensors and Machine Learning
M. Hansen, M.K. Haugland, T.
Sinkjær [HTML] [PDF]
P2.5 Auto-Myo-Electric Control of
FES on Tibialis Anterior. A Pilot Study
With Stroke Patients
R. Thorsen, J. Burridge, N. Donaldson, M. Ferrarin, J. Norton, P.
Veltink [HTML] [PDF]
P2.6 Effects of NMES in Patients With Refractory Heart Failure
M. Bijak , W.
Mayr, M. Quittan, A. Sochor, R. Pacher, E. Unger, D. Rafolt, H. Lanmueller, S. Sauermann, G. Freilinger [HTML] [PDF]
P2.7 FNS for Gait Component
Restoration Post Stroke
J.J. Daly, R.L. Ruff, A.A.
Debogorski, B.C. Strasshofer, E.B.Marsolais, K. Kollar [HTML] [PDF]
P2.8 The Use of Electrical Stimulation to Improve Motor
Control and Function of the Upper Extremity After Stroke: A Systematic Review
J.R. de Kroon, M.J.
Ijzerman, J.H. van der Lee, G.J. Lankhorst [HTML] [PDF]
P2.9
